BigLaw Associate Gets Nod to Argue Davila Case to SCOTUS By William Peacock, Esq. on April 16, 2013 10:01 AM
They knew from a young age that Clark Kent was destined to be far more than your average farm boy. In fact, to refer to him as a mere farmer does not do his mighty skill set justice, just as referring to Orrick’s Robert Yablon as an “associate” does not even begin to describe the young man’s accomplishments.
“Rob is the full package,” Joshua Rosenkranz of Orrick’s Supreme Court and appellate practice section told Bloomberg in a phone interview last week. “He is analytically brilliant. He is highly strategic. He is able to articulate in crisp clear prose the nub of the answer to any question, and he’s unflappable.”
It is rare that a BigLaw associate is tapped to argue a landmark case in front of the Supreme Court. Yablon is a rare associate, however. According to Bloomberg, he is a two-time Supreme Court clerk, first for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, followed by a stint clerking for Justice Sonia Sotomayor. After spending two years in SCOTUS’ chambers, a return as an appellate advocate should be far less unnerving, though one doubts there is ever a situation where arguing to the Nine is stress-free.
So what did he advocate when he stepped up to the podium yesterday? Keeping judicial intervention out of plea bargaining.
In 2010, Anthony Davila pled guilty to tax fraud claims. However, he only did so after his request for new counsel was denied. He made that request because his attorney did not advise him on any defensive strategies other than taking a plea. The judge, hilariously, and arguably inappropriately, responded:
The only thing at your disposal that is entirely up to you is the two or three level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. That means you’ve got to go to the cross. You’ve got to tell the probation officer everything you did in this case regardless of how bad it makes you appear to be because that is the way you get that three-level reduction for acceptance, and believe me, Mr. Davila, someone with your criminal history needs a three-level reduction for acceptance.
Yep. The judge told him to “go to the cross”, which is pretty hilarious. The Eleventh Circuit ruled that the judge’s conduct amounted to judicial participation in plea bargaining - a violation of Rule 11. For more on the case, check out our SCOTUS blog.
Related Resources:
U.S. v. Davila (Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals)United States v. Davila (SCOTUSblog)Supreme Court to review judge’s role in plea talks (Reuters)(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));TweetShareThis
Categories: Firm Life Tags: associate, clerkships, Orrick Herrington and Sutcliffe, plea bargaining, Robert Yablon, SCOTUS, U.S. v. Davila
See All FindLaw Blogs >>
Go To Greedy Associates Main Page >>
About Greedy Associates Greedy Associates covers the attorney lifestyle-- from law school to career and everything in between. Have a comment or tip? Write to us.
Subscribe to this blog's feed Subscribe to FindLaw News for Legal Professionals See all FindLaw RSS feeds Popular Topics ABA associate compensation bar exam BigLaw career paths careers ethics firm life humor job market law firm law firms law school law schools law students lawyer networking New York salaries Supreme Court Categories Bar Exam (25) Career Paths (109) FindLaw Answers (11) Firm Life (149) Greedy Stuff (136) Humor (151) Job Market (115) Law School (186) Legal History (10) Money (35) Pop Culture Lawyers (24) Training and CLE (26) Work-Life Balance (41) Archives Select a Month... April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 Search Greedy Associates About this Entry This page contains a single entry by William Peacock, Esq. published on April 16, 2013 10:01 AM.
Judge's Cell Phone Policy Puts Him in Contempt of His Own Court was the previous entry in this blog.
Helping Locals and Law Students? New Clinic Sounds Like a Winner is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Research the law Manage your practice Manage your career News and commentary Get Legal Forms About us Cases & Codes / Opinion Summaries / Sample Business Contracts / Research an attorney or law firm Law Technology / Law Practice Management / Law Firm Marketing Services / Corporate Counsel Center Legal Career Job Search / Online CLE / Law Student Resources Legal News Headlines / Law Commentary / Featured Documents / Newsletters / Blogs / RSS Feeds Legal Forms for Your Practice Company History / Media Relations / Contact Us / Advertising / Jobs Copyright ? FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment